Team Templates
By the Syncfusion DevTutorials team · Last updated
Scale specs across a team: a spec-review skill calibrated on graded examples, a definition of ready, and matching the spec's depth to the size of the change.
A Review Skill That Passes Everything
A skill is a file of instructions an agent loads for one job. In this lesson, you will write a skill that reviews specs. Then you will test that it really works.
Your team now writes specs before building.
Someone made a spec-review skill to check them.
It has only two rules:
- Check spelling.
- Make sure the spec looks professional.
A Real-World Example
You put up a new smoke alarm.
You press the test button to make sure it works.
- An alarm that never rings is useless.
- An alarm that rings every time you make toast gets switched off.
A review skill is the same. It must catch the bad specs and let the good ones through.
Six specs go through the skill.
- Three are strong.
- Three are weak.
The skill lets all six through.
Calibrate the spec-review skill
Click the button and open the card.
Press Check my spec with the starting skill.
- The checker says the first weak spec passes.
- It should have failed.
Simple lesson: a review skill is only as good as its rules. Test the rules on specs you already know are good or bad.
TL;DR
- Skill = a Markdown file (
SKILL.md) an agent loads for one job. - Spec-review skill = a skill that checks a spec before anyone builds from it.
- A good rule finds one clear problem that anyone can check.
Good rules catch:
- vague words like "fast";
- a requirement with no acceptance criterion;
- an outcome with no number;
- no non-goals;
- a risky action with no decision rule.
Calibration = testing the skill on specs you already graded.
- Weak specs must fail.
- Strong specs must pass.
- Definition of ready = the team checklist for when an agent may start.
- Small changes need small specs. Big, long-lived changes need the full set of files.
What You Will Learn
In this lesson, you will learn:
- What a skill is.
- How to write review rules a checker can apply.
- How to test those rules on graded specs.
- What a definition of ready is.
- How much spec each change needs.
About the checker in this lesson
- Fixed rules check your skill. No AI reads it.
- Each rule you write matches one known problem, like vague words.
- The rules run on six fixed specs, so your result is the same every time.
Skills
Shared templates and review skills help every spec follow the same standards.
A File for One Job
A skill is a short Markdown file.
It usually has:
- a name;
- a description;
- instructions;
- rules.
The agent loads the skill when the task matches it.
One skill should do one job. For example:
- a planning skill helps write plans;
- a review skill checks specs;
- a docs skill writes project docs.
A shared review skill means every spec gets the same checks, no matter who starts the review.
Rules a Checker Can Apply
Some rules cannot be checked the same way twice.
Example:
Make sure the spec looks professional.
Two people will read this rule in two different ways.
A good rule names one problem you can see in the spec.
Examples:
- Reject vague words like fast, easy, gracefully or user-friendly.
- Reject any requirement with no acceptance criterion that names it.
- Reject an outcome with no number.
- Reject a spec with no non-goals.
- Reject a risky action with no decision rule.
You met each of these problems earlier in the course.
Simple lesson: a good rule names one problem you can point at.
Calibration
Calibration = running your skill on specs that people have already graded, to see if it judges them right.
Fail the Weak, Pass the Strong
A calibration set = a few specs you already know are weak or strong.
Run the skill on all of them. Then look at the results.
- A weak spec passed? A rule is missing.
- A strong spec failed? A rule is too strict.
The goal:
Fail every weak spec.
Pass every strong spec.
Watch the skill improve, one rule at a time:
Each new rule caught one more weak spec. The strong specs passed every time.
Each rule also catches only its own problem:
Simple lesson: one rule, one problem. Then you always know which rule to fix.
Important: write the rule about the real problem, not a nearby word.
- "Reject any spec that mentions a migration" also blocks good specs.
- The real problem is a migration with no decision rule.
Definition of Ready
When May an Agent Start?
A definition of ready is a short team checklist.
- If a spec passes every item, an agent may start.
- If it fails one, the spec goes back to its author.
Common checks:
intent.mdnames a user.- The problem says what it costs.
- The outcome has a number.
- An owner is named.
- Every requirement has an acceptance criterion.
- Non-goals are written down.
- Risky actions have a decision rule.
Watch a checklist sort five specs from the backlog:
"It looks finished" let everything in. Three real checks blocked the three unready specs.
Simple lesson: a checklist only helps if each item is something you can check.
Lab Exercise: Write Your Team's Definition of Ready
This is a Tech-lead extra. In many teams, the tech lead owns this checklist.
The lab shows five backlog specs.
- Two are ready.
- Three are not.
Your task: write ready.md, one rule per line.
The checker runs your list on all five specs. You pass when the ready ones get in and the others are blocked.
Write a definition of ready
Match Spec Depth to the Change
Specs Are a Tool, Not a Ceremony
A spec exists to lower risk and make the work clear.
It is not paperwork.
Not every change needs the same amount of spec.
- Too much spec for a tiny fix wastes time.
- Too little spec for big work leads to guesses.
Birgitta Böckeler describes three ways teams use specs:
- Spec-first = write the spec before building.
- Spec-anchored = keep the spec up to date while the code changes.
- Spec-as-source = the spec is the main source of truth.
A simple guide:
| The change | The spec it needs |
|---|---|
| Fix a typo | A clear ticket or a short spec |
| Add a tooltip | spec.md with requirements and acceptance criteria |
| A new export API others depend on | The full set: intent.md, spec.md, plan.md, kept up to date |
Simple lesson: the bigger and longer-lived the change, the more spec it needs.
Lab Exercise: Calibrate the Spec-Review Skill
Go back to the lab card at the top of the lesson.
Replace the loose rules with real ones. Your skill must:
- fail S1, S2 and S3;
- pass S4, S5 and S6.
Press Check my spec until you get 6 of 6.
Each weak spec has one main problem. Find it, then write one rule that catches it.
What Changes per Tool
| Tool | Location of the spec-review skill |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | .claude/skills/spec-review/SKILL.md |
| Codex | .agents/skills/spec-review/SKILL.md |
| Cursor | .cursor/skills/spec-review/SKILL.md |
| Spec Kit | Installed as a prompt or integration-specific skill |
| Kiro | Defined through steering files or agent hooks |
The course export puts the review skill in the right folder for your tool.
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Wrong idea | Correct idea | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rules like "check spelling" | Neat specs are good specs. | Write rules about real problems. | Weak specs get through. |
| No calibration | "The rules look right." | Test the skill on graded specs. | You never find out what it misses. |
| A rule that is too strict | "Reject every migration." | Reject a migration with no decision rule. | Good specs fail, and people stop using the skill. |
| No definition of ready | "Any spec will do." | Keep a short team checklist. | Agents start on half-written specs. |
| The full set of files for everything | "More spec is always safer." | Match the spec to the change. | Small fixes take far too long. |
| No spec for big work | "We will figure it out." | Use the full set for long-lived features. | The agent guesses, on a big change. |
Exercises
These exercises help you practise writing review rules and checklists.
Press Check when you are ready. Use Show Hint if you get stuck.
What to Remember
- A skill is a file of instructions for one job.
- A spec-review skill checks a spec before anyone builds from it.
- Each rule should find one clear problem.
- Calibration tests the skill on specs you already graded.
- A weak spec that passes means a rule is missing.
- A strong spec that fails means a rule is too strict.
- A definition of ready says when an agent may start.
- Match the size of the spec to the size of the change.
Further Reading
- Understanding Spec-Driven Development: Kiro, spec-kit, and Tessl, by Birgitta Böckeler: spec-first, spec-anchored and spec-as-source.
- GitHub Spec Kit: a constitution as a team-wide definition of ready.
- Kiro steering: team rules every spec inherits.
Next: Spec Capstone. You will use everything from the course to write one complete spec, from start to finish.